The social costs of juveniles on sex-offender registries far outweigh benefits

The net social cost of applying sex-offender registration and notification laws to those who commit offenses as juveniles could be as high as $3 billion a year, with most of those costs incurred by neighbors of registered offenders, according to a new benefit-cost analysis from the R Street Institute. Full Article

Related

The costs and benefits of subjecting juveniles to sex-offender registration and notificationFull Report (pdf)

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The social costs of adults on sex-offender registries far outweigh benefits too.

Happy, John Walsh??? Happy????
Misguided moron!!!!!

The social costs…what in the world…since when did people start caring about the social costs for laws and legal operations?

If we actually cared about social costs the United States would:

1. Have way less people incarcerated, under house arrest, on probation, parole, and supervised release.

2. Solitary confinement wouldn’t exist.

3. No one would have a lifetime sentence or be sentenced to death. This includes no lifetime parole, probation, supervised release, or schemes requiring periodic check ins with law enforcement such as sex offender registration.

4. Civil commitment would not be indefinite and only geared towards those needing intense in patient attention. Also it would occur instead of prison or jail time.

5. Insane asylums or mental intuitions would have to aggressively treat mental issues so that no person would be locked away for longer than absolutely necessary. Rather than claiming something as delusion science would have to come up with better explanations for why an individual believes what they do.

6. Children (prepubescent), adolescents (pubescent), adults, and the elderly alike would all be directed to targeted programs before incarceration, fines, restitution, parole, probation, or supervised release were considered.

7. Front end programs that focus on inclusion rather than exclusion of individuals would be implemented to increase opportunity and provide safe educational environments for exploration. Essentially there exists real world situations or experiences that are difficult to become familiar with outside of a larger experience.

8. Social costs of anything would be considered just as much as economic or national security costs.